|
|
|
Good
Governance Monitoring Report – Issue no. 1
|
|
|
|
3.3 Ministry of Education and Higher Education
Performance
The performance of the MoEHE
during the period covered by this report can be characterized as a
continuation of negative performance features that existed during previous
governments. That is, negative
performance that is not organically linked to, and therefore not entirely
justified by, the ongoing political, economic and social crisis. 3.3.1
MoEHE Budget
MoEHE expenditure constituted
18% of total actual PNA on-budget expenditure in 2005. Although, the MoEHE
budget is the second largest (after the Ministry of Interior and National
Security which represents approximately 25% of total PNA annual expenditure)
the allocation is insufficient to cater for the majority of the development
needs of the education sector, which are largely funded by donor countries
through extra-budgetary projects. The lack of a formal budget in
2006 and the reduction of donor assistance to the MoEHE since the formation
of the 10th government have decreased the MoEHE capacity to
execute many of its planned development activities for 2006. Also, the financial deficit of the MoEHE
has increased. The following examples
illustrate the effects of lack of budget and international funding on
education services: ·
MoEHE
is unable to implement the majority of planned school expansions, which will
worsen the problem of over-crowded classrooms. ·
MoEHE
is unable to provide supplies for science labs in most public schools,
rendering these labs virtually useless. ·
Most
schools cancelled the pre-high school diploma exams for lack of budget to buy
“answer books”. ·
MoEHE
had to train 9,000 teachers on the new curriculum without carrying out the
customary training needs assessments. Despite the fact that a PLC
decision to allow appropriation of funds in 2006 in line with the 2005 budget
gives the MoEHE room to spend, there are many limitations on spending in
practice: ·
Irregularity
of transfers from MoF to MoEHE: MoEHE received three equal payments totaling
only US$ 308,000 (0.58% of MoEHE budget).
These transfers are not only inadequate in amount but were also not
timed to meet the cash flow requirements of the MoEHE. ·
The
transfers are insufficient to allow MoEHE to pay its debts to certain key
suppliers, including the Palestinian Telecommunication Company. The MoEHE accumulated large amounts of arrears
and anecdotal evidence suggests that many of the MoEHE suppliers are
refraining from dealing with MoEHE as a result of outstanding payments due to
them. Some suppliers have been quoting
the MoEHE higher prices because they expect delays in payments. ·
Foreign
suppliers are refraining from dealing with MoEHE because of the international
embargo against the 10th government. It should also be noted here
that number of teachers providing “Islamic education” has witnessed a noticeable
increase from previous years in all districts. This is largely attributed to the
Minister’s decision to increase the number of Islamic education classes from
three to four per week, at the expense of civic education classes. The GGI views this decision to be dangerous
from a governance perspective as it carries unexamined long-term financial
implications (about 1,000 new teachers specializing in Islamic education will
be needed to cover the additional classes next year), and because it comes at
the expense of civic education classes which are the main classes taught to
students to promote the principles of democracy and a civil society. 3.3.2 Transparency
The MoEHE has not made any
significant progress with respect to transparency in performance and use of
resources during the period under review.
The MoEHE has not published its plans for the education sector or the
public education policies, with its publications being limited to periodic
statistical reports on the education sector.
Whilst records of Cabinet discussions suggest that the MoEHE was among
the ministries that prepared an emergency plan that was subsequently approved
by the Cabinet, this has not been made public. This is despite the fact that
the Cabinet decision number 10/01/06, taken on April 5th 2006,
stipulated that "the members of the Cabinet shall prepare their
respective ministries' plans covering the period extending from May to
December 2006 and, in accordance with the government program, these shall be
presented to the PLC”. In fact,
anecdotal evidence clearly suggests that this plan was not even communicated
within the ministry. The MoEHE has recruited
approximately 1,800 employees including 1,261 teachers ( 3.3.3 Planning, coordination,
participation
MoEHE is currently operating
without a strategic plan as the existing five-year plan of 2001-2005 is
out-of-date. MoEHE worked on a review
of the education sector with support from the World Bank with a view to using
the findings in the development of a new five year plan from 2006-2010. The
review included detailed studies about education in MoEHE activities during the
period under review did not reveal any evidence of any strategic, participatory
planning and coordination; no meetings or workshops were held with CSOs to
obtain their views and suggestions. Coordination with CSOs has been limited
to dealing with logistics such as distribution of schoolbags on pupils. Also, largely due to the embargo on the 10th
government, only one meeting was held by the Education Sector Working Group
(a body consisting of a number of public institutions and donor countries to
coordinate aid and technical assistance). Also, internally within the
MoEHE, the Educational Committee held only one meeting. This committee, whose
membership includes the Minister, Directors General and senior employees at
MoEHE, is responsible for setting the general policies and annual plans of
the Ministry and discussing the educational issues on regular basis. Furthermore, the Higher Education Council,
a body chaired by the Minister and responsible for coordination with the
Universities, did not meet. These developments
indicate a serious reduction in participation in decision-making and
coordination internally within the Palestinian health sector. 3.3.4 Commitment to rules and
regulations
The review of MoEHE commitment
to rules and regulations was limited to appointments, promotions and staff
transfers due to lack of access to information regarding other decisions and
actions. New appointments are covered
in section 3.3.2 above. In relation to
promotions and transfers, many school principals were appointed as directors
of regional education offices without going through the job ranking process,
in violation of the Civil Service Law, and without any internal announcement
to identify the best candidates. The Minister also promoted a number of
employees without interview by a special committee, as stipulated by the
Ministry’s internal regulations. Published by Good
Governance Initiative - 2006 |
[1]
The number of people working in
the Palestinian education sector at schools reached 58,816 by the start of the new
school year. The figure includes 39,867 employees at public schools; 9,286 at
UNRWA schools; 5,573 at private schools; and 4,090 at kindergartens.