|
|
|
Good Governance Monitoring Report – Issue
no. 1
|
|
|
|
Forty
Days of Strike: Impact on Palestinian Public Life
This article is a summary of a report prepared by
the Birzeit University Center for Continuing Education (Public Administration
and Civil Service Reform Programme) examining the perceptions of public sector employees and
Palestinian citizens regarding the extent of, and motivations for, the strike
and its impact on civilian (not security) services. The report
was based on evidence gathered during the first two weeks of October 2006
through a total of 65 in-depth interviews with senior figures working in the
public and private sectors and ordinary citizens residing in various
locations across the West Bank and Gaza Strip Background The Union of Public Sector Employees (UPSE) called for a one-day
strike on August 23, 2006 as a protest against the government failure to pay
public sector employees’ salaries. On August 28, 2006, the UPSE called for a
further, open-ended strike, which commenced on September 2, 2006 and
continues to this day. Since calling for the open-ended strike the UPSE
has issued eight statements stressing the need for continuation of, and
commitment to, the strike. However, the UPSE has also granted certain
exemptions in order to lessen some of the negative social and economic
impacts of the strike. Motivations for strike action Initially, the non-payment of salaries and a general desire
(particularly in the Extent of the strike According to interviews with senior officials working in public sector
organizations, employees’ compliance with the strike is more comprehensive in
the West Bank than the Gaza Strip[1], making the effect of the strike
significantly more noticeable in the former than the latter. It should
be noted here that it is not possible to report the exact number or
percentage of employees on strike in either the Ministry of Education & Higher
Education Although attendance at Gaza schools was reduced during the first week
of the strike, partly due to pressure from parents on teachers and
administrators to reopen schools, it is now “business as usual”. In the
Ministry of Health According to senior officials’ estimates, attendance at the central
Ministry of Health (MoH) in the Gaza Strip exceeds 80%, and staff attendance at
public hospitals exceeds 90%. In the Ministry of Social Affairs At the Ministry of Social Affairs (MoSA), the situation is the reverse
of that observed in the health and education sectors. In the Gaza Strip,
staff attendance is reportedly less than 10% and is largely limited to senior
staff attending to urgent matters. In the Ministry of Interior The Ministry of Interior in The impact of the strike; the impact
of the boycott According to many interviewees, the impact of the strike on
Palestinian public life cannot be neatly separated from the impact of the
financial boycott imposed on the PNA in April 2006. The effects of the
strike have been reflected in declining services and touched all aspects of
political, social, and economic life. The strike has also affected all
population segments, but it was mostly felt by the poor who can not afford
substituting the services provided by the government (especially heath and
education) for similar services provided by the private sector. As a
result, many families who have faced emergency health conditions during the
period of the strike have reportedly resorted to debt from family or friends
to secure needed money for emergency health care in the private sector
hospitals. Education Sector There was a consensus among the interviewees that the strike is having
a severe impact in the education sector in the While teachers stated that it is still be possible to make up for lost
classroom time if the strike ends soon, they expressed concern regarding
their future ability to deal with negative attitudes and behaviors acquired
by students during the strike (e.g., loss of faith in, and respect for
teachers, and hence loss of classroom control). According to both
teachers and parents, the strike has already led to some worrying
developments in the behaviour of students. Teachers are also experiencing professional and personal problems as a
result of the strike. In addition to deteriorating relationships with
students and parents in their communities, teachers find themselves in direct
conflict with their colleagues due to disagreements over the validity of the
strike. Even those teachers who are still attending school find that
personal concerns about the current situation and the future are having a
negative impact on their professional performance. Also, fearing increasing
job insecurity, some teachers have already started looking for other jobs,
sometimes overseas. Health sector The impact of the decline in public health services in
both the West Bank and Overall, interviewees cited the following primary impacts of the
strike: ·
contagious
disease which were previously under control may spread again due to a decline
in vaccinations; ·
to
the extent that certain medical supplies are available (despite the
international boycott) lack of therapy may threaten the lives of patients
with chronic diseases; and, ·
friction
between public health workers and citizens and loss of confidence in the
public health system generally – there are already reports of fights breaking
out between medics and citizens and guilt-related psychological problems
amongst health workers. Private sector The strike has brought the provision of public services to the private
sector to a virtual standstill. Interviews with private sector
companies (including banks) and employees, revealed the following recurring
themes regarding concerns related to ongoing strike action combined with the
financial boycott: ·
new
companies are unable to register and open bank accounts; ·
reduced
control over quantity and quality of goods entering the territories resulting
in an increase in tax evasion and public health risks; ·
reduced
real estate mortgage lending and car loans as borrowers are unable to produce
official title documents (i.e., proof of legal ownership); and, ·
increased
incidence of mortgage and loan defaults (especially amongst public sector
workers). Interviewees claimed long-term, negative consequences for the private
sector are already beginning to emerge: ·
foreign/diaspora
investors in the local economy are “giving up on ·
profitability
of key local companies’ profits has dropped significantly. Public administration and civil
service Many interviewees expressed concerns about the long-term impact of the
strike on the Palestinian public administration and civil service in general,
highlighting the following: ·
civil
servants, citizens and business people are losing confidence in the long-term
viability of the public sector and there are early signs of people turning to
the Israeli civil administration to try to solve public service problems
(e.g., private companies are approaching the Israeli civil administration to
provide import/export permits); ·
there
are cases of households, officially registered as refugees, who were
previously accessing PNA health and educational services but have turned back
to UNRWA; ·
civil
servants, concerned more than ever about job security, are considering
alternative careers and, given the thin domestic labour market, are looking
overseas; ·
increasing
friction amongst civil servants, and between civil servants and citizens, due
to differing opinions of the legitimacy of the strike and the gravity of its
impact on the community; ·
increasing
friction between civil servants not receiving salaries and those who are
receiving payments via donor-funded projects or posts; ·
further
loosening of institutional and organizational discipline in the PNA due, inter
alia, to loss of respect for senior managers and loss of loyalty to the
employing organizations in general; ·
reversals
of previous policy and administrative decisions based on sentiment, not
evidence, leading to confusion and chaos. Palestinian opposition to the strike Many Palestinian individuals and organizations have warned against
continued strike action. Prominent individuals and civil society
organizations have issued a series of statements calling for exempting vital
public service facilities from the strike due to the serious threats it poses
to the loss of human and social capital. In response to the many calls by human rights, health, and education
organizations, as well as by several groups, academics and activists to end
or limit strike action, the UPSE approved some exemptions in the Ministry of
Interior, postal services, and recently vehicle licensing services. The
union also responded to the President’s call to allow the first instance
court in Also, the strike of Conclusions This qualitative survey of Palestinian perceptions indicates that the
strike of public employees is adding to the socio-economic crisis
precipitated by the financial boycott imposed on the PNA by the international
community and the Government of Israel. There is grave skepticism
regarding the likelihood that the strike will bring about an end to, or
relaxation of, the boycott. The economic distress arising from the financial boycott coupled with
the social and psychological impact of loss of basic education and health
services appears to be driving a rapid breakdown in public service delivery
which may have long-term implications for Palestinian society and its
institutions. The socio-economic
impact of the strike is being felt most acutely amongst the poorer members of
society in the West Bank (Gaza being largely sheltered by a combination of
limited compliance with the strike and the continued provision UNRWA services
to the refugee majority) and, given the perception that FATEH is
orchestrating the strike for political reasons, the strike may have lasting,
negative political implications for the main secular movement in Palestinian
politics. Published by Good Governance Initiative - 2006 |
[1] Commitment to the strike in the Gaza Strip reduced rapidly
after the first week.
[2] MoEHE does not collect data on school attendance at the