Weekly News digest
Local Dailies & Radio translation



Polls trends analysis
Survey - Based research Studies


In-depth analysis on specific issues
JMCC reprints




contacts in Palestine by Category






Beg, Borrow or Steal
Israeli settlement in the occupied Palestinian territories

(JMCC, pp 35, September 1991)


 "Settlement is part of the regional conflict between us and the Arab world and between us and international parties like the United States. For me, settlement is not a big issue- it's a normal process. If we establish a settlement here or expand a settlement there, this is only natural. We are operating according to our understanding that the land belong to us".

Israeli Prime Minster Yitzhak Shamir in an interview with Ma'ariv, translated in Al-Quds, 9 September 1991.


Contents

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Government sponsorship of settlement
      • 2.a. Funding Construction
      • 2-b. Free Land, Financial Incentives for Developers
      • 2-c. Industrial Incentives
      • 2.d. Provision of Infrastructure
      • 2-e. Incentives for Settlers
  • 3. Mass immigratio and the push for settlement
  • 4. Footing the settlement bill
  • 5. Settlement strategy for the1990's
      • 5.a. West Bank
      • 5.b. Gaza Strip
      • 5.c. The Highway system
  • 6. Aparthm - Israeli style
  • Case Studies:
      • West Bank: Beit Aryeh
      • East Jerusalem: Umm Touba
      • Gaza Strip: Gush Katif
  •  Appendices
      • Appendix A: Appropriation of Palestinian Land
      • Appendix B: Mortgage Loans Available to Israelis
      • Appendix C: Proposed Expansion by Settlement


    Introduction

    From the end of the Gulf war through the month of August, a period during which US Secretary of State Baker visited the Middle East five times in an effort to initiate peace negotiations, Israel appropriated over 100,000 dunams of Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank (see Appendix A), established four new settlements, conferred official "city" status for the first time on a West Bank settlement, announced plans for "greater" Jerusalem, and began construction of seventeen new roads serving settlements.

    Israel's seizure and settlement of Palestinian land is not a new governmental policy, nor is it simply the initiative of selected government ministers currently in power. Since the start of its military occupation in 1967, Israel has steadily appropriated Palestinian lands and sponsored the settlement of its citizens within the occupied territories, in direct contravention of internationally recognised laws governing the administration of occupied territories.1 By 1991, Israel had seized an estimated 65% of Palestinian land in the West Bank and 42% of the Gaza Strip. 2

    Land takeovers are executed using a complex network of military orders which illegally alter the laws in force at the time of the occupation. 3 (See box, p. 2, for methods of land takeover. )4 Much of the land appropriated from Palestinians has been used for the establishment of civilian settlements and their supporting infrastructure. Approximately 230,000 Israeli settlers have thus taken up permanent residence in the occupied territories, 5 where they enjoy the same rights and protection as resident citizens of Israel, while over two million Palestinians, legally stateless, live under foreign military occupation.

    While numerous private and quasi-governmental agencies are involved in settlement, settlement development has been a fundamental component of every government programme from the start of the occupation to date; the government has always been responsible for final approval of all settlement activity. It was only a short time after the occupation began in 1967 that the Labour party first put forward a plan for control of the West Bank through settlement, and it was under a Labour-led government that the first settlements were established. 6 As recently as 8 August, director-general of Prime Minister Shamir's office Yossi Ben-Aharon defended the current escalation in settlement construction as government policy, saying "any decision on the actual starting of a new settl&nent .. goes through this office. This has always been the case."7