Contents
Introduction
Palestinian Agrriculture Before the Uprising
Land Confiscation
Water Resources
Restriction of Export to Israel
Unrestricted Dumping of Israeli Surpluses
Lack of Agricultural Services
Control of Agricultural Supplies
Curfews and Sieges
Idna
Beit Ummar
Qabatia
Azzoun
Tel
Marketing
Punitive Bans of Export
Harassment During Produce Transport
Harassment of Fruit and Vegetable Outlets
The Olive Harvest
Destruction, Confiscation and Harassment
The Uprooting of Trees
Arson Against Trees
Destruction of Farm Premises and Machinery
Land Confiscation
Harassment of Shepherds
Conclusion
Appendix 1 Reported Cases of Tree Uprooting and Cutting
Appendix 2 Rennrted Cases of Arson
Appendix 3 Reported Cases of Land Confiscation
References
Introduction
This report covers the period between the star-t of the
Palestinian uprising (December 1987) and the end of March 1989. During
this period the Israeli authorities enforced a range of punitive measures
against the agricultural sector in the West Bank and Gaza Strip:
Curfews and sieges were Imposed on villages during which
crops rotted in the fields, sowing dates were missed, diseases damaged
crops which were not sprayed on time, access to grazing for livestock was
denied, and marketing of produce was prevented.
- Export of crops from particular villages to Jordan or
Israel was prohibited, specifically as a punitive measure.
- The transport of produce to market was obstructed.
- Tens of thousands of olive, almond and citrus trees were
uprooted by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and Israeli settlers.
- Thousands of trees were destroyed by arson attacks.
- Tens of thousands of dunams of land were confiscated.
- Arbitrary and exorbitant taxes were Imposed on merchants
working in the agricultural sector.
- Crops were destroyed in their fields by the IDF.
- Livestock grazing was restricted; shepherds were harassed
and In two cases, murdered.
- Several poultry farms were demolished by the IDF.
In many of these cases the Israeli authorities have openly
specified that the measures were taken in retaliation for antloccupation
protests In the villages concerned - a clear form of collective punishment.
In some cases these measures were Justified for "security reasons",
while in others no official explanation was offered.
While these measures have primarily been enforced by the
IDF, there have been many examples of settlers taking the law Into their
own hands, without restraint or investigation from the IDF.
Some of these measures have received Intermittent attention
In the foreign press, however many have gone unreported. The measures have
now become so commonplace that few journalists regard them as newsworthy.
Individual incidents of tree uprooting or land confiscation appear relatively
unimportant next to the more dramatic and spectacular events of the past
18 months. Nevertheless when viewed collectively the scale of these measures
Indicates a policy no less disturbing than the beatings, arrests and killings
which have held the media's attention.
This report comprises a collection of examples
of sanctions taken against Palestinian agriculture. it is intended for
use by journalists and researchers who seek to draw attention to these
events. Information has been drawn from two main sources: field visits
during which interviews were conducted with farmers who provided first
hand accounts of sanctions, and local newspapers (Al-Fajr, Al-Quds, Al-Shalab,
Al-Ittihad, Al-Talia, Al-Fajr English and Al-Nahar).
The researchers are aware of the limitations of using
press reports. At times they may be inaccurate, and many incidents go unreported
either because the press was not informed or because publication was forbidden
by the military censor; all newspapers must be submitted to the Israeli
censor prior to publication, and a substantial proportion of the articles
submitted are routinely rejected. In general it was evident to the researchers
that only a small proportion of the sanctions against agriculture which
occurred actually found their way into the newspapers: during field visits
a large number of incidents were encountered which were not reported in
the press. The statistics derived from newspaper reports should therefore
be considered minimum estimates of the actual scale of incidents.
Agriculture is most vulnerable to sanctions during harvest
time, when sieges leave crops rotting in the fields and marketing restrictions
prevent their sale. As this report is published, so new harvests are approaching.
It is hoped that this report can help to discourage the Israeli authorities
from imposing a new series of sanctions, and to allow Palestinian farmers
what is their basic right - to sow their land, harvest their crops and
sell their produce.