Contents
1. Introduction
2. Background
- 2.1 Changes in Soviet Jewish Emigration Patterns
- 2.2 Israel's Settlement Policy Since 1967
- 2.2.1 Settlement of the Occupied Territories
- 2.2.2 Annexation of East Jerusalem
3. Mass Soviet Jewish Emigration 1990: L-xaells Response
- 3.1 Channeling Emigrants to Israel
- 3.2 Encouraging Settlement in the Occupied Territories
- 3.3 The Question of East Jerusalem
- 3.4 Censorship
- 3.5 In Comparison: Family Reunification for Palestinians
4. International Aspects
- 4.1 The Arab World
- 4.2 The USSR
- 4.3 The USA
5. Israeli Settlements and the Prospects for Peace
Apppendices
Introduction
During 1990 the issue of the emigration of Soviet Jews
to Israel made international headlines. The mass influx of Soviet Jewish
immigrants to Israel was made possible by the relaxation of emigration
restrictions in the Soviet Union and the introduction of immigration quotas
in the USA, the country where most Soviet Jews permitted to emigrate during
the 1980s had preferred to settle.
The Palestinians and the Arab world as a whole expressed
their concern that the large-scale immigration to Israel, facilitated by
the superpowers, would reduce the prospects for a negotiated peace between
Israel, the Palestinians and the Arab states. In particular, attention
was focused on the resettlement of Soviet Jews in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, territories occupied by Israel during the 1967 Israeli-Arab war.
At the time of writing (October 1990) the issue remains
controversial, and a matter of discord especially between the governments
of Israel and the United States respectively. With the wave of immigration
precipitating a housing crisis in Israel, the Israeli government requested
additional US aid to help in resettling the new immigrants. The US administration
pressed for assurances that the new immigrants would be settled only within
the pre-1967 borders of Israel and not in the occupied territories. US
officials, moreover, called for a freeze to Israel's settlement policy
in general.
At the beginning of October 1990, the US finally approved
the housing loan after having received the required assurances from Israeli
Foreign Minister David Levy. The furor over Levy's letter to US Secretary
of State James Baker however, has highlighted the extent to which the US
administration and the Israeli government disagree on the settlement of
the Soviet Jewish immigrants. While in his letter Levy pledged that Israel
would not settle the new immigrants in the occupied territories, Prime
Minister Shamir and other government members immediately distanced themselves
from this pledge, thus widening the rift between Israel and the US.
The aim of this paper is to examine the issue of Soviet
Jewish immigration to Israel in the context of Israel's occupation of the
West Bank and Gaza Strip. It is not the large-scale immigration per se
which has given rise to the current controversy; rather, the mass influx
of immigrants to Israel has exacerbated a situation that has been controversial
ever since Israel embarked on the policy of settling its citizens in the
occupied territories.
According to the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention, an occupying
power is not allowed to settle its own civilian population in the territory
it occupies.1 Israel, however, in order to further its settlement of the
occupied territories, has chosen to misread this stipulation as applying
only to the "forcible" transfer of civilians. Ever since the
housing of Soviet Jewish immigrants in Israel settlements in the West Bank
and Gaza Strip has again focussed international awareness on the illegality
of these settlements, Israel has consistently tried to divert attention
from this central issue and instead advanced the Soviet Jews' right to
live where they want.
Chapter 11 of this paper will provide background information
to the current controversy over immigration to Israel and settlement of
the occupied territories. A brief historical overview (2.2) will focus
on official government policy in support of Israeli settlement of the West
Bank and Gaza Strip. Israeli rule over Arab East Jerusalem will be treated
separately (2.2.2) since the case of East Jerusalem is a striking illustration
of how Israel implements demographic policy at the expense of the Palestinian
population.
Chapter III will discuss the settlement of the Soviet
Jewish immigrants in the occupied territories, with particular emphasis
on the way the Israeli government minimises its own role in this settlement
process. A separate section on Palestinian family reunification (3.5) serves
in this context to highlight the double standards the Israeli authorities
apply to Jewish immigrants and the indigenous Palestinian population respectively.
On behalf of Soviet Jews, Israel usually quotes Art 13.2 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, according to which "everyone has the
right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country."
While Israel advocates the Soviet Jews' right to emigrate, it is the right
to return to their country which, since 1967, Israel has been denying to
tens of thousands of Palestinians from the occupied territories. The international
response to the settlement of Soviet Jewish immigrants in the West Bank
and Gaza Strip will be the subject of chapter IV.