Home
  


Your Time | Jerusalem Time



 Skip Navigation Links
BACKGROUND
Fast Facts
Expert Contacts
Official Contacts
Offices & Organizations
Documents & Maps
Historical Timeline
Help Desk
IN THE NEWS
Price protests
Hamas
Conflict scenarios
Jerusalem
Home demolitions
All Backgrounders
NEWS
Latest News
Multimedia
Reuters Wire
Blogs
Corrections
Advanced Search
COMMUNITY
Notice Board
Calendar
Letters to the Editor
MY JMCC
What is this?
Join
Log In
Set as Homepage
Edit your account
PRESS SERVICES
JMCC Services
Media Directory
Hot Spot
WAYS TO GET JMCC
Dailies & SMS
E-mail Newsletter
RSS
CONTACT US
User Support
Submit a Story
Staff List
Advertise
 

Jerusalem Media & Communications Centre

Promote Your Page Too

Follow JerusalemMedia on Twitter
News & Politics

Culture

Business & IT

Opinions

Log in to My JMCC
Email
Password
 or Sign Up
Forgot your password?Close
 My JMCC
Front Page
My Comments Photo of the Day
Calendar Hot Spot(for journalists)
Audio of the Day Video of the Day
Most Popular Historical Timeline
Noticeboard Blogs
My Tags Help Desk
  
User Info
First Name
Last Name
Username
Email
My Tags 
I am a
After signing up,you will receive
an automatically
generated password in your
email.
Close
Recover Password
Submit Your Email
 or Sign Up
Close

Saturday Aug. 4, 2012 2:15 AM (EST+7)
EDITORIAL: Between Obama and Romney
print Print
 Email
   Text
Skip Navigation Links
Share

RAMALLAH, August 3, 2012 (JMCC) - The combination of US President Barack Obama’s abandonment of the Middle East peace process and Republican candidate Mitt Romney’s exaggerated support for Israel should generate worry among those who care about the Mideast region. For many decades (and especially since the beginning of the peace process in 1991), the leadership role of the United States in making peace between Palestinians and Israelis has been an article of faith.
EnlargeMitt Romney is running for president of the United States in 2012.


Multimedia
al-Jazeera Int: Dining with Terrorists, Fighting Occupation Pt. 1
March 8, 2009 9:03 AM (EST+7)
al-Jazeera Int: Dining with Terrorists, Fighting Occupation Pt. 2.
March 8, 2009 9:34 AM (EST+7)
Al-Jazeera Int: US President Barack Obama on 'seige' of Gaza
June 16, 2010 10:01 AM (EST+7)
Documents
Agreement on Movement and Access
Behind the Settlements: Israel‘s West Bank Settlements Now Sit on the Wrong Side of Zionist History
Do Settlements Matter? An American Perspective
Publications
An Issue and an Audience: A Series of Seminars
Analysis of Palestinian Public Opinion on Politics: Popular Trust in Palestinian Islamist Factions
Foreign Aid and Development in Palestine - Phase I Report
Background
Annapolis Conference
Camp David II
Annapolis Conference
Resources
"US Munitions Delivered to Israel," Amnesty International, April 2, 2009
The recognition of the State of Israel, Harry S. Truman Library and Museum
Bush Calls Israeli Withdrawal Plan Progress Toward Peace/Statement - USDOS press release, April 14, 2004


Now, with the complete stagnation of the peace process and irreversible changes Israel is implementing in the occupied territories, many people in the region are beginning to ask questions about US-led efforts. In the last four years, Obama swung between active enthusiasm and involvement, which positively targeted illegal settlement as the obstacle to serious talks, and complete lack of serious engagement, even engagement necessary to maintain the status quo. The impact of this vacillation has been to stymie progress.

The right-wing government in Israel, which is politically incompatible with peace efforts that will end the occupation and bring about a two-state solution, has taken advantage of Washington’s indifference. As a result, the occupation is becoming more entrenched by the day and the creation of facts on the ground that preclude the two-state solution is ongoing.

The other dangerous development resulting from this stagnation is a further shift in Israel towards hard line right-wing politics in Israel. This is apparent in public opinion and official institutions, which increasingly support once-controversial policies such as settlement expansion in nearly every part of the West Bank and the political separation of the West Bank from the Gaza Strip. All this will make it still more difficult to realize the international vision of peace that is based on the two-state solution.

Into this gloomy environment were interjected the shocking statements of presidential candidate Mitt Romney during his visit to Israel. Romney contradicted international law and the official positions of the United States when he encouraged Israel’s illegal occupation of east Jerusalem. He also compromised the independence of the United States when he said the US should not have political differences with Israel. He then went even further to claim that the differences between the Israeli and Palestinian economies can be explained by “culture”, ignoring the fact that Israel has been economically exploiting the occupied territories for the last 45 years. Israel has given itself the liberty to exploit Palestinian land and resources below and above the land, making use of key religious sites to benefit from tourism and also for decades profiting from as many as 200,000 cheap Palestinian laborers. Israel’s wealth is partly due to the spoils of illegal occupation.

Moreover, the weaknesses of the Palestinian economy are mainly--if not solely--attributable to Israeli restrictions, not some inherent cultural characteristic. Romney’s racist comments led many Palestinians to respond with despair, that a power that has so much control over their destiny could be so blatantly unfair. Such sentiment bodes ill for the future US role in the peace process. One can only say as a result that the competition between US presidential candidates over who is more pleasing to Israel and its supporters in the United States is seriously damaging the credibility of the United States and its leading role as peace broker.

Palestinians understand that many other dramatic developments are underway in the region that demand attention and effort by the international community. We also understand that in an election year, the US administration will focus on domestic demands. However, policymakers in the United States should likewise understand that leaving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict unattended and even without basic “maintenance” is contributing further to an erosion of the possibilities of two states, which will later lay a huge burden on the international community as it tries to resolve the conflict otherwise. Moreover, regional instability remains deeply connected to the status of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

As such, other members of the international community, especially Europe, should increase their role in implementing peace based on international legality. This should encourage the United States to adopt a more effective position, replace the US monopoly with collective efforts,  and thereby reduce the negative impact of internal American politics on peacemaking.  

It should be eminently clear by now that maintaining double standards in the region does not serve US foreign policy goals. The United States cannot pretend to be keen on freedom, liberty, dignity and human rights elsewhere in the region while neglecting those rights for Palestinians.




Log in Login to be able to add comment Add comment  Rules ( 0 )





Mitt Romney is running for president of the United States in 2012.



Skip Navigation Links
About JMCC
Press Services
Dailies & SMS
Polls
Publications

 




Submit News
Message
Email Address
Upload File






Skip Navigation Links
Make JMCC your homepage   |  
RSS   |  
Write for us   |  
FAQ: Comments & Moderation   |  
FAQ: Population Data   |  
Contact Us   |